The idea behind showing you a trip from the surface of the earth the ultra-small (MICROWORLD)
to the ultra-large (MACROWORLD) was an important journey because it was a straight-line journey
towards a totally possible travel vector. In other words, given that the energy and the
equipment is built then a straight line journey could be possible between two asymptotic limits
which are actually the same
point
of singularity (from our three dimensional world perspective). Click on the colored bottle where it says "Who am I and Where am I"
The actual path into a wormhole appears to follows the path you will see on the MP3 graphic: In other words the metric tensors experience a pollydimensional
change and "Transposes" our "3 space" dimensional world into another "Brane"
Admittedly, This tensor measuring process gets tricky and it I believe it happens when "objects" get smaller and smaller (10 ^-33) because things that are smaller
can only be sensed using instruments (which are themselves build with atoms that are bigger than 10^-33).
One can only conclude that "information" immerging from the microworld would necessarilly have to come from the interactions of particles smaller than "QUARKS". The Microworld is not like "deep space" where you can always poke a stick
further out there, and atoms will still be allowed be "constructed upon" further into empty space. The concept that "the ultra-small eventually meets the ultra-large" is not beyond the impossible just as the Lorentz transformation is not beyond the concept of the speed of light.
One thing is for sure, the definition
of "getting to the point" is well proved when undertaking a straight journey from the microcosmic world
to the macrocosmic world as shown in the Charles and Ray Eames film "powers of ten". That original film along with the short clip from the movie "CONTACT" are probably the best two seeds for
the process of igniting an autonomous "psychogenesis" in the minds of the reader who seeks an epithany and a personal discovery of purpose. These film experiences help a person understand what
"space metrics" are in principle.
More than this, -at some point of observation the abstract of singularity is confronted head on.
the metrics are from 10 to the power of 25 down to 10 to the power of -18, but they could just as
well have been from 10 to the power of 1000
to 10 to the power of -1000. In fact the metrics are irrelevant aren't they?
You see the spatial expansion of the big bang is nothing more than singularity expanding in a continuous displacement.
This displacement is the same singularity that exists in the center of a black hole. Perhaps even ANY black hole center IS
the same point we call singularity. Many people believe this. The proof is not anywhere obvious except behind the wall of "abstract"
A perfect example of this is to view the two dimensional graphical interpretation of an asymptote.
OK now I did mention a rare and
misunderstood term called "an asymptote and it's limit". Now I'm going to have to tell you to be
patient as we enter the ABSTRACT WORLD.
It's been called the Rabbit hole,
the wormhole, the strange but real impossibility that rational conservative people refuse to confront because it seems "unknowable".The truth is that we are talking about "Time Travel".
Right away many people will roll their eyes up and smile as they see the ugly "PARANORMAL" issue make it's appearance in the comonly held objective reality we share (or seem to share)
Let's continue the "Critical thinker" thread here! Let's look at commonly held notions about time travel. The following examples will introduce the "either/or" concept of thinking. Supposing I would tell you:
"Either the sun will rise tomorrow, or I will die before I can see it.
This statement sets into motion some rather important and dramatic circumstances to balance
using an "either/or" proposition. The chances are also good that I will not see the sun rise tomorrow
if I leave the United States to visit Australia tomorrow. The fact is; "time" in Autralia is also subject
to the relative position of the sun.
and therefore the conditional "or Causal" relationship in my previous statement seems less dramatic
and totally likely. My argument is that any proposition which is based solely on the either/or principle without considering
alternatives is always doom to failure (this concept from a man called Morgan). The same applies to the paradoxes usually found in the
"Time Travel" scenarios.
The Travel paradoxes:
The first and most important paradox is called the cardinality paradox.
It States: All paradoxes are allowed except for the paradox that "no paradox" is allowed.
This is called the "dissalowed" primary strange loop.
At this point It would be useful to introduce the work by Goëdel:
Now that we have finished with primary logical concepts let's look at sequences in time travel logic.
It has been argued that:
“If you see the future, then act to change it (and succeed), you didn't see the future at all, just a possible future.
And everyone sees possible futures all the time
(it's called imagination). “
”If, on the other hand, you see the future and CAN'T change it, then there is no free will and past and future
are meaningless; everything that has happened and will happen have already been written, including your very
premonitions.”
“Seeing the future without possessing free will is as mundane as a mathematical equation, and of as little impact on
the human condition.”
"what if" is the correct answer as well as the correct question. What if: -As soon as you become the lease bit informed
of a paradox, the paradox dissapears? It would certainly seem exactly like something we call Déjà Vu
More to come
We too are continuing to explore and we
sure hope you will eventually want to learn more about "Autonomous Psychogenesis"
Keep in mind that we are still looking for a doctor in Psychology to assist in our
research. Here is a video on the "Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence" as refered to in this webpage:
More to come.... Stay tuned.
Your MIB host Raymond Tromprenard
